Quantcast
Channel: What is the weird correspondance between subset ⊂ and implication ⇒? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 4 View Live

Answer by Karl for What is the weird correspondance between subset ⊂ and...

In the usual development of set theory, the expression $A\subseteq B$ is defined to mean $\forall x(x\in A\to x\in B)$.Similarly, $A\cup B$ denotes the set of all $x$ satisfying $x\in A\lor x\in B$,...

View Article


Answer by Ned for What is the weird correspondance between subset ⊂ and...

The implication (if $P$ then $Q$) is true IFF the set of assignments (propositional, first order, whatever depending on the setting) which satisfy $P$ is a subset of the set of assignments which...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Answer by ryang for What is the weird correspondance between subset ⊂ and...

using (p ⇒ q) ≡ (¬p∨q) yielded a weird Venn diagramOkay, this is the Venn diagram (here, white space signifies that no element is contained there) that you are referring to:This diagram says: If it...

View Article

What is the weird correspondance between subset ⊂ and implication ⇒?

As i am learning mathematical logic , I noticed similarities between the concepts of logical connecters and set operators.Most of these made sense like how p ∧ q corresponds to P ∩ Q. Statement p ∧ q...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 4 View Live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>